PDA

View Full Version : Immortality?


Mado
09-23-2009, 11:37 AM
I thought this was interesting, and might spark a bit of conversation:

The 61-year-old American, who has predicted new technologies arriving before, says our understanding of genes and computer technology is accelerating at an incredible rate.

He says theoretically, at the rate our understanding is increasing, nanotechnologies capable of replacing many of our vital organs could be available in 20 years time.

Mr Kurzweil adds that although his claims may seem far-fetched, artificial pancreases and neural implants are already available.

Mr Kurzweil calls his theory the Law of Accelerating Returns. Writing in The Sun, Mr Kurzweil said: "I and many other scientists now believe that in around 20 years we will have the means to reprogramme our bodies' stone-age software so we can halt, then reverse, ageing. Then nanotechnology will let us live for ever.

"Ultimately, nanobots will replace blood cells and do their work thousands of times more effectively.

"Within 25 years we will be able to do an Olympic sprint for 15 minutes without taking a breath, or go scuba-diving for four hours without oxygen.

"Heart-attack victims – who haven't taken advantage of widely available bionic hearts – will calmly drive to the doctors for a minor operation as their blood bots keep them alive.

"Nanotechnology will extend our mental capacities to such an extent we will be able to write books within minutes.

"If we want to go into virtual-reality mode, nanobots will shut down brain signals and take us wherever we want to go. Virtual sex will become commonplace. And in our daily lives, hologram like figures will pop in our brain to explain what is happening.

"So we can look forward to a world where humans become cyborgs, with artificial limbs and organs."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/6217676/Immortality-only-20-years-away-says-scientist.html

Epyon
09-23-2009, 12:00 PM
I've heard about these sexbots, and those aren't supposed to be available for fifty years or so according to the expert on The Colbert Report. The immortality thing seems really far off to me, though. Implants and artificial organs and all that fun stuff I'm sure we'll have, but I don't think we'll live forever, hopefully not at any point. Besides, if we do, where are we all going to go?

Ryujin
09-23-2009, 12:39 PM
Well, if we got that advanced I would hope we could either colonize planets and create our own ecosystems, or create space stations in the form of small worlds. But that seems a bit far off to me.

Living 'forever', or at least not dying from old age, isn't really that complicated. Currently our body's cells just slowly stop healing and replenishing themselves, leading to wrinkles, aging, failing organs, etc. If we can find a way to slow that down or replenish/heal cells at a faster rate, we're at least looking at a lot longer life span; and it wouldn't just be an extra 50 years of being old, either.

AkuTenshi
09-23-2009, 12:46 PM
I have two things to say:

1) Firefly

2) See our post on why cancer hasnt been cured.

Peace out homey-g-dawg-yo.

Ryujin
09-23-2009, 12:59 PM
What I'm talking about wouldn't cure disease, just aging. It would actually prolong people's lives, giving doctors and pharmaceutical companies more patients. Plus it would probably be sellable by the companies as well.